Edward G. Spranger v. Anthony A. Frank, Postmaster General, United States Postal Service

15 F.3d 1089 5 NDLR P 89 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Edward G. SPRANGER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Anthony A. FRANK, Postmaster General, United States Postal Service, Defendant-Appellee. No. 92-15812. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Oct. 8, 1993. * Decided Nov. 24, 1993. 1 Before THOMPSON and O'SCANNLAIN, Circuit Judges; NIELSEN, ** District Judge. 2 MEMORANDUM *** 3 Edward G. Spranger appeals pro se a summary judgment against his various employment claims against the United States Postal Service ("USPS") challenging the USPS' termination of his employment and subsequent refusal to rehire him. Because Spranger has alleged both discrimination and nondiscrimination claims against the USPS, his action constitutes a "mixed case." 5 U.S.C. Sec. 7703 (b)(2); Romain v. Shear, 799 F.2d 1416, 1422 (9th Cir.1986). 4 * Spranger asserts that he is entitled to be restored to employment under the Federal Employees Compensation Act, 5 U.S.C.…