Seffatollah Sarmadi v. Immigration & Naturalization Service

15 F.3d 1089 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Seffatollah SARMADI, Petitioner, v. IMMIGRATION & NATURALIZATION SERVICE, Respondent. No. 92-70298. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Dec. 17, 1993. * Decided Dec. 27, 1993. 1 Before: BROWNING, NORRIS, and O'SCANNLAIN, Circuit Judges 2 MEMORANDUM ** 3 Sarmadi petitions for review of the order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (the "BIA") affirming the immigration judge's determination that he was deportable under 8 U.S.C. Sec. 1251 (a)(4) for his conviction for crimes involving moral turpitude. Sarmadi argues that the Immigration and Naturalization Service ("INS") failed to carry its burden under Sec. 1251(a)(4) to show that the crimes did not arise out of a single scheme of criminal conduct. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 8 U.S.C. Sec. 1105a(a). The petition for review is denied. 4 Sarmadi is a citizen and national of Iran who became a legal permanent resident of the United States…