In Re S & G Press, Inc., Debtor. Becker Law Office v. United States Trustee, David A. Summers, Trustee of the S & G Press Estate, Trustee-Appellee

15 F.3d 1089 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. In re S & G PRESS, INC., Debtor. BECKER LAW OFFICE, Appellant, v. UNITED STATES TRUSTEE, Appellee, David A. Summers, Trustee of the S & G Press Estate, Trustee-Appellee. No. 92-16394. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted Jan. 13, 1994. Decided Feb. 8, 1994. 1 Before: GOODWIN, WIGGINS, and BRUNETTI, Circuit Judges 2 MEMORANDUM * FACTS 3 S & G Press, Inc. ("S & G") blamed its business failure in part on Harris Graphics Corp. ("Harris"), alleging that Harris had sold S & G a faulty printing press. Unable to meet orders consistently, S & G lost its largest customer. The press had been financed by U.S. Concord, Inc. ("Concord"). S & G sued Harris and Concord. Attorney Gyemant represented S & G under a contingency fee arrangement: Gyemant was to take 25% of an award or settlement plus separate reimbursement for expenses. Harris and S & G settled, and $2…