Jerardo Rodriguez v. Patricia Lilienthal Laura Austin Charles James Michael Hogan

15 F.3d 1089 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Jerardo RODRIGUEZ, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Patricia LILIENTHAL; Laura Austin; Charles James; Michael Hogan, Defendants-Appellees. No. 93-35036. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Dec. 6, 1993. * Decided Dec. 21, 1993. Before: SNEED, NOONAN, and TROTT, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Jerardo Rodriguez, an Oregon state prison, appeals pro se the district court's summary judgment in favor of defendant Patricia Lilienthal and dismissal of defendants Laura Austin, Charles James, and Michael R. Hogan in his 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 action against prison health officials and United States District Judge Hogan, alleging that Lilienthal, Austin, and James were deliberately indifferent to his medical needs for a serious mental disorder and that defendant Hogan conspired with the other defendants to violate Rodriguez's Eighth Amendment rights. We affirm. I. FACTS AND PRIOR PROCEEDINGS 3…