Nos. 92-55792, 92-56195

Good Law
15 F.3d 1089
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitDecember 29, 19931089California1,176 words

Opinion

Opinion

15 F.3d 1089 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. SAY & SAY; L. Shieh, Plaintiffs-Appellant, v. Bill LAYMAN, a/k/a/ Bill Soaman, an individual; Gemma Sanchez; Francisca N. Araiza; Imperial Savings; Household Bank, and Does 1 through 1,000, inclusive; Andrew Castellano; Gary Hollingsworth, Defendants-Appellees. SAY & SAY; L. Shieh, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. Bill LAYMAN, a/k/a/ Bill Soaman, an individual; Gemma Sanchez; Francisca N. Araiza; Imperial Savings; Household Bank, Defendants-Appellees. Nos. 92-55792, 92-56195. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted Dec. 10, 1993. Decided Dec. 29, 1993. Before: ALDISERT, * HUG, and SCHROEDER, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Liang-Houh Shieh, an attorney, and his law firm, Say & Say (collectively "Shieh"), appeal several district court orders dismissing their civil rights, RICO, and state law claims, and imposing sanctions on much of their behavior in this litigation. We affirm on…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.