San Francisco Culinary, Bartenders & Service Employees Welfare Fund, an Unincorporated Association San Francisco Culinary, Bartenders & Service Employees Pension Trust Fund, an Unincorporated Association v. Ivan Lucin, Individually and as a Partner Dba Il Pirata Katica Lucin, Individually and as a Partner Dba Il Pirata, San Francisco Culinary, Bartenders & Service Employees Welfare Fund, an Unincorporated Association San Francisco Culinary, Bartenders & Service Employees Pension Trust Fund, an Unincorporated Association v. Ivan Lucin, Individually and as a Partner Dba Il Pirata Katica Lucin, Individually and as a Partner Dba Il Pirata

Good Law
15 F.3d 1089·1993 U.S. App. LEXIS 37483
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitDecember 7, 199392-15086California1,830 words

Opinion

Opinion

15 F.3d 1089 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. SAN FRANCISCO CULINARY, BARTENDERS & SERVICE EMPLOYEES WELFARE FUND, an unincorporated association; San Francisco Culinary, Bartenders & Service Employees Pension Trust Fund, an unincorporated association, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. Ivan LUCIN, individually and as a partner dba Il Pirata; Katica Lucin, individually and as a partner dba Il Pirata, Defendants-Appellees. SAN FRANCISCO CULINARY, BARTENDERS & SERVICE EMPLOYEES WELFARE FUND, an unincorporated association; San Francisco Culinary, Bartenders & Service Employees Pension Trust Fund, an unincorporated association, Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. Ivan LUCIN, individually and as a partner dba Il Pirata; Katica Lucin, individually and as a partner dba Il Pirata, Defendants-Appellants. Nos. 92-15086, 92-15099. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted April 13, 1993. Decided Dec. 7, 1993. Before: GOODWIN, HUG, and FLETCHER,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.