Balwant Singh v. Immigration and Naturalization Service

15 F.3d 1089 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Balwant SINGH, Petitioner, v. IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE, Respondent. No. 92-70495. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted Dec. 17, 1993. Decided Jan. 27, 1994. Before: POOLE, BEEZER and KLEINFELD, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM * 2 Singh argues that we lack jurisdiction to hear his petition, because his application for temporary residence as a special agricultural worker remains pending. But the record does not establish that he has filed such an application or that it is pending. The record includes a final order of deportation, on its face ripe for review on a petition to this court. Singh did not cause a copy of his alleged application to be included in the administrative record, to which our review is confined. 8 U.S.C. Sec. 1105a(a)(4). Although his attorney has represented that to his knowledge such an application was filed and remains pending, his information might…