Steven Russo, Jr. Samuel J. Reyes v. Willis Casey

Good Law
15 F.3d 1089·1993 WL 534315·1993 U.S. App. LEXIS 37485
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitDecember 22, 199393-15686California867 words

Opinion

Opinion

15 F.3d 1089 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Steven RUSSO, Jr.; Samuel J. Reyes, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. Willis CASEY, et al., Defendants-Appellees. No. 93-15686. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Dec. 6, 1993. * Decided Dec. 22, 1993. Before: SNEED, NOONAN, and TROTT, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Stephen Russo and Samuel Reyes, "Patrol Special Police Officers" 1 appeal the district court's order granting the defendants' motion to dismiss their 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 action as time-barred. Russo and Reyes claim that their constitutional rights were violated when former San Francisco Police Chief Willis Casey and nine members of the police department allegedly engaged in a campaign of retailiation and harassment against them after they embarrassed the police chief at a public hearing. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1291 . We affirm. 3 We review de novo the district court's dismissal of a complaint on statute of…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.