Daryle E. Swedenburg Mary Jo Swedenburg, His Wife, and Steven M. Swedenburg v. United States

Good Law
15 F.3d 1090·1994 WL 6612·1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 6335
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJanuary 10, 199492-36609California740 words

Opinion

Opinion

15 F.3d 1090 73 A.F.T.R.2d 94 -1302 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. DARYLE E. SWEDENBURG; MARY JO SWEDENBURG, his wife, Plaintiffs-Appellants, and STEVEN M. SWEDENBURG, Plaintiff, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Defendant-Appellee. No. 92-36609. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Dec. 20, 1993. * Decided Jan. 10, 1994. Before: SNEED, NOONAN, and TROTT, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Daryle E. Swedenburg and Mary Jo Swedenburg (the Swedenburgs) appeal pro se the district court's dismissal for failure to state a claim, or alternative grant of summary judgment for the United States, in their action seeking to quiet title to real property against tax liens pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2410 . We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1291 , and we affirm. 1 3 "We review de novo a district court's dismissal of a complaint for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted." Elias v. Connett, 908 F.2d 521, 527 (9th Cir.1990).…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.