United States v. Winfred Christian Bocage
Opinion
Opinion
15 F.3d 1090 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Winfred Christian BOCAGE, Defendant-Appellant. No. 93-50036. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted Jan. 6, 1994. Decided Jan. 20, 1994. 1 Before: GOODWIN and HALL, Circuit Judges, and TANNER, * District Judge. 2 MEMORANDUM ** 3 Winfred Bocage appeals his sentence after a conviction by a jury trial of assaulting a federal employee in violation of 18 U.S.C. Sec. 111 . Bocage challenges his 36 month sentence on two grounds. First, he argues that the district court erred when it did not credit him for acceptance of responsibility. Second, he argues that the district court relied on two unconstitutional prior convictions in determining his criminal history. We have jurisdiction over this timely appeal and affirm. I. ACCEPTANCE OF RESPONSIBILITY 4 The Sentencing Guidelines allow a defendant to reduce his offense level by two points if he…