Vathsala Srinivasan v. Rowland Unified School District

Good Law
15 F.3d 1090·1994 WL 35539·1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 6348
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitFebruary 8, 199493-55288California1,372 words

Opinion

Opinion

15 F.3d 1090 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Vathsala SRINIVASAN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. ROWLAND UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT, Defendant-Appellee. No. 93-55288. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Feb. 2, 1994. * Decided Feb. 8, 1994. Before: TANG, PREGERSON, and NOONAN, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** OVERVIEW 2 Petitioner Vathsala Srinivasan appeals the District Court's order granting summary judgment in favor of Respondent Rowland Unified School District. Srinivasan alleges that the school district violated her rights under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act, 42 U.S.C. Sec. 2000e et seq., when it terminated Srinivasan as a Mathematics teacher. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1291 . We affirm. BACKGROUND 3 Vathsala Srinivasan, who is of East Indian descent, holds a degree in Mathematics. On August 15, 1989, Srinivasan applied for a full-time teaching position with the Rowland Unified School District ("Rowland"). Following…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.