United States v. Michael Buchholz, AKA James Alan Barnett

15 F.3d 1090 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Michael BUCHHOLZ, aka James Alan Barnett, Defendant-Appellant. No. 93-30022. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Dec. 16, 1993. * Decided Dec. 22, 1993. Before: GOODWIN, CANBY and KOZINSKI, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Michael Buchholz appeals his jury conviction and sentence for drug trafficking, contending that (1) the district court should have vacated his conviction on one count and (2) the court erred in attributing various amounts of cocaine to Buchholz at sentencing. We AFFIRM. 3 In August, 1992, the jury convicted Buchholz of various drug trafficking crimes, following a trial before the Honorable Charles R. Weiner, visiting judge. Four codefendants, who pled guilty to drug trafficking charges, testified against Buchholz pursuant to plea bargains. All four identified Buchholz as one of their cocaine suppliers and described…