People v. Churchill CA3

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJuly 5, 2022C095567California1,912 words

Opinion

Opinion

Filed 7/5/22 P. v. Churchill CA3

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT

(Shasta) ----

THE PEOPLE, C095567

Plaintiff and Respondent, (Super. Ct. Nos. 20F5297, 20F8072, 21F3977, 21F6684, v. 21F7242)

DOMINIC PATRICK CHURCHILL,

Defendant and Appellant.

Appointed counsel for defendant Dominic Patrick Churchill filed an opening brief setting forth the facts of the case and asking this court to review the record to determine whether there are any arguable issues on appeal. (People v. Wende (1979) 25 Cal.3d 436.) Defendant filed a supplemental brief raising several issues. After reviewing the entire record, we find no arguable error that…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.