Julie Sheridan v. Caesars Enterprise Services

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJuly 5, 202221-16717California1,276 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS JUL 5 2022

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

JULIE SHERIDAN, No. 21-16717

Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 2:20-cv-00126-APG-DJA v.

CAESARS ENTERPRISE SERVICES, MEMORANDUM*

LLC,

Defendant-Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Nevada Andrew P. Gordon, District Judge, Presiding

Argued and Submitted June 15, 2022 San Francisco, California

Before: S.R. THOMAS, GOULD, and BEA, Circuit Judges.

This case is an appeal of the district court’s grant of summary judgment in

favor of Appellant’s employer who terminated her employment “for cause” after a

night of alcohol-fueled incidents during a company-sponsored event. Appellant

challenges her termination, claiming that her employer violated the terms of the

employment contract and since she was terminated without proper “cause,” she is

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. entitled to a severance package. The…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.