United States v. Kevin Lamar Brown

15 F.3d 1090 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Kevin Lamar BROWN, Defendant-Appellant. No. 92-50749. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted Dec. 8, 1993. Decided Dec. 17, 1993. Before: FLETCHER, PREGERSON, and HALL, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM * 2 Kevin Lamar Brown appeals the district court's denial of his suppression motion and his Rule 29 motion for acquittal, as well as his subsequent conviction of one count of bank robbery in violation of 18 U.S.C. Sec. 2113 (a). Brown also argues that prosecutorial misconduct during closing argument requires reversal. 3 The district court had jurisdiction pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 3231 . We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1291 and we affirm. I. 4 Brown contends that the district court erred in denying his motion to suppress evidence because police officers lacked reasonable suspicion to stop the Mazda RX-7. We review de novo…