United States v. Joseph Calles, AKA Joe Calles, United States of America v. Raquel Harris, United States of America v. Marvin David Harris

15 F.3d 1090 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Joseph CALLES, aka Joe Calles, Defendant-Appellant. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Raquel HARRIS, Defendant-Appellant. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Marvin David HARRIS, Defendant-Appellant. Nos. 92-10590, 92-10675 and 92-10699. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted Nov. 2, 1993. Decided Nov. 24, 1993. Before: ALARCON, LEAVY and KLEINFELD, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM * 2 We affirm all three convictions. I. Calles appeal--92-10590 3 The standard for reviewing the sufficiency of the evidence and the district court's denial of the motion for acquittal is "whether, after reviewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution, any rational trier of fact could have found the essential elements of the crime beyond a reasonable doubt." Jackson v. Virginia, 443 U.S. 307, 319 (1979); United…