In the Matter of Paramvir Singh Tuli, Debtor. Balbir Singh Tuli v. Charter Pacific Bank

15 F.3d 1090 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. In the Matter of Paramvir Singh TULI, Debtor. Balbir Singh TULI, Appellant, v. CHARTER PACIFIC BANK, Appellee. No. 92-16317. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Jan. 18, 1994. * Decided Jan. 25, 1994. Before: REINHARDT, O'SCANNLAIN, and KLEINFELD, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Balbir Singh Tuli appeals pro se the district court's dismissal of his appeal from the bankruptcy court's dismissal of his involuntary Chapter 11 bankruptcy petition, filed to force his son, Paramvir, into bankruptcy. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. Sec. 158 (d), and we affirm. 3 The district court dismissed as moot Tuli's appeal because the properties of the estate were sold after the bankruptcy was dismissed and before the appeal. This court reviews questions of mootness de novo. Friends of the Payette v. Horseshoe Bend Hydroelectric Co., 988 F.2d 989, 996 (9th Cir.1993). 4 Fed.R.Bankr. 8005 provides that…