Terry James Tucker v. Carl Nink, Warden A.S.P.C. Ft. Grant Robert Corbin, Attorney General of the State of Arizona

15 F.3d 1090 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Terry James TUCKER, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Carl NINK, Warden A.S.P.C. Ft. Grant; Robert Corbin, Attorney General of the State of Arizona, Respondents-Appellees. No. 92-16060. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Jan. 4, 1994. * Decided Jan. 13, 1994. Before: REINHARDT, O'SCANNLAIN, and KLEINFELD, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Arizona state prisoner Terry James Tucker appeals pro se the district court's dismissal of his 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2254 petition for writ of habeas corpus. Tucker raised fifteen grounds for relief in his petition challenging his 1988 Arizona state convictions and sentences for burglary and possession of narcotics. The district court dismissed the petition without prejudice as a mixed petition of exhausted and unexhausted claims. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Secs. 1291 , 2253. We review de novo a district court's decision of a petition for writ of habeas…