United States v. Rachelle Cox

15 F.3d 1091 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Rachelle COX, Defendant-Appellant. No. 9210693. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted Nov. 1, 1993. Decided Jan. 27, 1994. 1 Before: KOZINSKI and O'SCANNLAIN, Circuit Judges, and KELLEHER, * District Judge 2 MEMORANDUM ** 3 Appellant Rachelle Cox appeals the sentence imposed for her conviction of possessing with intent to distribute a controlled substance, and aiding and abetting, in violation of 21 U.S.C. Sec. 841 (a)(1) and 18 U.S.C. Sec. 2 . I. 4 Cox argues that the district court erred in attributing to her the full amount of methamphetamine found in the bedroom she shared with co-defendant Earl Byers. A district court's factual determinations made in the course of applying the sentencing guidelines are reviewed for clear error. United States v. Sanchez, 967 F.2d 1383, 1384 (9th Cir.1992). The amount of contraband attributable to a…