United States v. Daryl Drummond, United States of America v. Janet Drummond, AKA Janet N. Disanti

15 F.3d 1091 73 A.F.T.R.2d 94 -663 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Daryl DRUMMOND, Defendant-Appellant. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Janet DRUMMOND, aka Janet N. DiSanti, Defendant-Appellant. Nos. 93-50113, 93-50120. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted Nov. 4, 1993. Decided Dec. 23, 1993. Before: BROWNING, BEEZER, and TROTT, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM * 2 In this consolidated appeal, Daryl Drummond contends that there was insufficient evidence to support his convictions for subscribing to false tax returns in violation of 26 U.S.C. Sec. 7206 (1). Daryl and Janet Drummond challenge those convictions as well as Janet's convictions for failure to file a federal tax return in violation of 26 U.S.C. Sec. 7203 and for subscribing to a false tax return in violation of 26 U.S.C. Sec. 7206 (1). They contend that the district court erred by admitting into evidence…