Michael Bruzzone v. Intel Corporation

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS JUL 6 2022

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

MICHAEL A. BRUZZONE, No. 22-15157

Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 3:22-mc-80001-WHA

v.

MEMORANDUM*

INTEL CORPORATION,

Defendant-Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California William Alsup, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted June 15, 2022**

Before: SILVERMAN, WATFORD, and FORREST, Circuit Judges.

Michael A. Bruzzone appeals pro se from the district court’s order

dismissing his qui tam action under a prefiling vexatious litigant order. We have

jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review for an abuse of discretion. In re

Fillbach, 223 F.3d 1089, 1090-91 (9th Cir. 2000). We affirm.

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). The district court did not abuse its discretion by rejecting…