Ewart

Ewart v. County of Los Angeles CA2/7

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJuly 6, 2022B312295MCalifornia4,588 words

Opinion

Opinion

Filed 7/6/22 Ewart v. County of Los Angeles CA2/

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION SEVEN

ALLISON EWART, B312295

Plaintiff and Appellant, (Los Angeles County Super. Ct. No. v. 20STCV37314)

COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, ORDER MODIFYING

OPINION

Defendant and Respondent. (NO CHANGE IN THE

APPELLATE

JUDGMENT)

THE COURT:

It is ordered that the opinion filed herein on June 27, 2022 be modified as follows: On page 2, line seven of the first full paragraph, the word “Ewart” in the phrase “holding, because Ewart was an unpaid volunteer” is deleted and replaced with the word “Galloway.” There is no change…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.