Cassilly

Cassilly v. City of L.A. CA2/8

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJuly 6, 2022B311132California2,987 words

Opinion

Opinion

Filed 7/6/22 Cassilly v. City of L.A. CA2/

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION EIGHT

BARRY CASSILLY et al., B311132

Plaintiffs and Appellants, Los Angeles County v. Super. Ct. No. 19STCP00586

CITY OF LOS ANGELES,

Defendant and Respondent.

APPEAL from an order of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County, James C. Chalfant, Judge. Affirmed. Gaines & Stacey, Fred Gaines and Alicia B. Bartley for Plaintiffs and Appellants. Michael N. Feuer, City Attorney, Terry P. Kaufmann- Macias, Assistant City Attorney, Kathryn C. Phelan and Oscar Medellin, Deputy City Attorneys, for Defendant and Respondent. ____________________________________

SUMMARY

Plaintiffs Barry Cassilly, the Linden Living Project, LLC,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.