Cable

Cable v. O'Neill CA4/1

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJuly 7, 2022D079096California1,801 words

Opinion

Opinion

Aaron, J.

Filed 7/7/22 Cable v. O’Neill CA4/

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

COURT OF APPEAL, FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION ONE

STATE OF CALIFORNIA

DENISE CABLE et al., D079096

Plaintiffs and Appellants,

v. (Super. Ct. No. 37-2019- 00018657-CU-BC-CTL)

MICHAEL THOMAS O’NEILL,

Defendant and Respondent.

APPEAL from an order of the Superior Court of San Diego County, Joel R. Wohlfeil, Judge. Reversed. Dean Gazzo Roistacher, Lee H. Roistacher, Samuel C. Gazzo and Joseph M. Radochonski for Plaintiffs and Respondents. No appearance for Defendant and Respondent.

Denise and James Cable appeal an order denying their motion for attorney fees after the trial court entered judgment in their favor on their breach of contract claim against Michael O’Neill for failing to repay a debt…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.