United States v. Benito Galarza-Noges

15 F.3d 1091 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Benito GALARZA-NOGES, Defendant-Appellant. No. 92-10287. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Dec. 20, 1993. * Decided Jan. 10, 1994. Before: SNEED, NOONAN, and TROTT, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Benito Galarza-Noges (Galarza-Noges) appeals the length of the sentence imposed by the district court following his judgment of conviction after pleading guilty to illegally entering the United States after being previously deported, a violation of 8 U.S.C. Sec. 1326 . He also filed a four page declaration which appears to raise an ineffective assistance of counsel claim. 3 Galarza-Noges' attorney filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), in which he states that there are no colorable claims which can be raised on appeal. In Anders, the Supreme Court outlined the procedural requirements to be followed by appointed…