Gerardo Garcia-Castillo v. Merrick Garland

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJuly 7, 202220-72495California635 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS JUL 7 2022

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

GERARDO GARCIA-CASTILLO, No. 20-72495

Petitioner, Agency No. A205-004-862

v.

MEMORANDUM*

MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted July 5, 2022** Seattle, Washington

Before: CLIFTON and BUMATAY, Circuit Judges, and CHEN,*** District Judge.

Gerardo Garcia-Castillo petitions for review from a Board of Immigration

Appeals’ (“BIA”) decision denying his application for cancellation of removal and

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). *** The Honorable Edward M. Chen, United States District Judge for the Northern District of California, sitting by designation. denying his motion for a continuance. We review constitutional claims de novo,

Vargas-Hernandez v.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.