David Peasley v. Katherine Rippberger

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJuly 7, 202220-16695California710 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS JUL 7 2022

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

DAVID SCOTT PEASLEY, No. 20-16695

Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 5:18-cv-03498-LHK

v.

MEMORANDUM*

KATHERINE RIPPBERGER, LVN, San Quentin State Prison,

Defendant-Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California Lucy H. Koh, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted July 6, 2022** San Francisco, California

Before: WALLACE, FERNANDEZ, and SILVERMAN, Circuit Judges.

David Peasley appeals from the district court’s prescreening order dismissing

his excessive force claim against nurse Katherine Rippberger, from the district

court’s summary judgment in favor of Rippberger on Peasley’s deliberate

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). indifference and first amendment retaliation claims, and from the district…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.