Engage BDR v. Amobee CA2/8

Filed 7/7/22 Engage BDR v. Amobee CA2/

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION EIGHT

ENGAGE BDR, LLC, B309263

Plaintiff and Appellant, Los Angeles County Super. Ct. No. 19SMCV01261 v.

AMOBEE, INC.,

Defendant and Respondent.

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County, Harry Jay Ford, III, Judge. Affirmed.

Bushell Law, Daniel A. Bushell; The Law Office of Thad M. Scroggins and Thad M. Scroggins for Plaintiff and Appellant.

Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton, Martin D. Katz and Bridget J. Russell for Defendant and Respondent. ____________________ The trial court correctly awarded the contractual attorney fees at issue. A firm called Engage BDR, LLC entered a Master Agreement requiring it…