Cable

Cable v. O'Neill CA4/1

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJuly 7, 2022D078601California5,196 words

Opinion

Opinion

Aaron, J.

Filed 7/7/22 Cable v. O’Neill CA4/

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

COURT OF APPEAL, FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION ONE

STATE OF CALIFORNIA

DENISE CABLE et al., D078601

Plaintiffs and Respondents,

v. (Super. Ct. No. 37-2019- 00018657-CU-BC-CTL)

MICHAEL THOMAS O’NEILL,

Defendant and Appellant.

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of San Diego County, Joel R. Wohlfeil, Judge. Affirmed. Arendsen Cane & Molnar, Christian S. Molnar; Atabek & Associates and Jon A. Atabek for Defendant and Appellant. Dean Gazzo Roistacher, Lee H. Roistacher, Samuel C. Gazzo and Joseph M. Radochonski for Plaintiffs and Respondents.

Denise and James Cable sued Michael Thomas O’Neill for breach of contract and a common count of money had and received after O’Neill failed to…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.