Cable
Cable v. O'Neill CA4/1
Opinion
Opinion
Aaron, J.
Filed 7/7/22 Cable v. O’Neill CA4/
NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS
California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.
COURT OF APPEAL, FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT
DIVISION ONE
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
DENISE CABLE et al., D078601
Plaintiffs and Respondents,
v. (Super. Ct. No. 37-2019- 00018657-CU-BC-CTL)
MICHAEL THOMAS O’NEILL,
Defendant and Appellant.
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of San Diego County, Joel R. Wohlfeil, Judge. Affirmed. Arendsen Cane & Molnar, Christian S. Molnar; Atabek & Associates and Jon A. Atabek for Defendant and Appellant. Dean Gazzo Roistacher, Lee H. Roistacher, Samuel C. Gazzo and Joseph M. Radochonski for Plaintiffs and Respondents.
Denise and James Cable sued Michael Thomas O’Neill for breach of contract and a common count of money had and received after O’Neill failed to…