United States v. Kraig Kavanagh, United States of America v. Carl Vincent Bergeman

15 F.3d 1092 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Kraig KAVANAGH, Defendant-Appellant. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Carl Vincent BERGEMAN, Defendant-Appellant. Nos. 93-50467, 93-50468. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted Jan. 6, 1994. Decided Jan. 10, 1994. 1 Before: GOODWIN and HALL, Circuit Judges, and TANNER, District Judge. ** 2 MEMORANDUM ** 3 Appellants Kraig Kavanagh and Carl Vincent Bergeman appeal the denial of their motion to suppress evidence. We affirm. I. Probable Cause 4 Appellants argue that the search warrant executed by the Huntington Beach Police Department was constitutionally defective. Specifically, they claim that the affidavit submitted by the local police lacked sufficient evidence of probable cause to support the issuance of a warrant by the Central Orange County Municipal Court to search Bergeman's residence and a business jointly owned…