United States v. Gonzalo Gomez-Morales, United States of America v. Jaime Patino Monzalde, United States of America v. Carlos Benitez, United States of America v. Jaime Quintero, United States of America v. Jimmy Grisales

Good Law
15 F.3d 1092·1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 6686
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJanuary 25, 199492-10398California2,238 words

Opinion

Opinion

15 F.3d 1092 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Gonzalo GOMEZ-MORALES, Defendant-Appellant. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Jaime Patino MONZALDE, Defendant-Appellant. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Carlos BENITEZ, Defendant-Appellant. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Jaime QUINTERO, Defendant-Appellant. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Jimmy GRISALES, Defendant-Appellant. Nos. 92-10398, 92-10400, 92-10401, 92-10402 and 92-10410. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted Dec. 13, 1993. Decided Jan. 25, 1994. Before: WALLACE, Chief Judge, GARTH * and WIGGINS, Circuit Judges. MEMORANDUM 1 Gomez-Morales (Gomez), Patino Monzalde (Patino), Benitez, Grisales, and Quintero appeal from their judgments of conviction for conspiracy to distribute cocaine and attempting to possess cocaine with intent to distribute, each a violation…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.