United States v. Eliseo Medina-Elenes

15 F.3d 1093 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Eliseo MEDINA-ELENES, Defendant-Appellant. No. 92-30398. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted Nov. 1, 1993. Decided Nov. 24, 1993. Before: REINHARDT, BRUNETTI, and FERNANDEZ, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM * 2 Eliseo Medina-Elenes appeals his convictions and sentence for conspiracy to possess cocaine and heroin with intent to distribute and distribution of cocaine and heroin in violation of 21 U.S.C. Secs. 841 (a)(1) and 846. He raises three claims. First, he argues that the government failed to use reasonable efforts to produce its informant. Second, he contends that the district court misapplied the Sentencing Guidelines by attributing to him all of the drugs sold by the conspiracy and by miscalculating his base offense level. Finally, he argues that the district court erroneously applied the firearm enhancement to his sentence. We…