United States v. Leslie Scott McKenneth United States of America v. Randall Darring

Good Law
15 F.3d 1093·1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 6711
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJanuary 5, 199493-50099California1,578 words

Opinion

Opinion

15 F.3d 1093 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Leslie Scott McKENNETH, Defendant-Appellant, UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Randall DARRING, Defendant-Appellant, Nos. 93-50099, 93-50111. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Nov. 5, 1993. * Decided Jan. 5, 1994. Before: BROWNING, BEEZER, and TROTT, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Leslie McKenneth and Randall Darring pleaded guilty to conspiracy to possess with intent to distribute cocaine in violation of 21 U.S.C. Sec. 846 . Their pleas were conditioned on the reserved right to appeal. They challenge the denial of their motions to suppress evidence. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1291 , and we affirm. 3 * Detective Maples and Deputy Salcido of the Los Angeles Police Department arrested McKenneth and Darring in the Los Angeles International Airport on July 16, 1992. The officers became suspicious of the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.