Xiangfu Chen v. Merrick Garland

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJuly 8, 202220-72934California519 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS JUL 8 2022

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

XIANGFU CHEN, No. 20-72934

Petitioner, Agency No. A202-198-791

v.

MEMORANDUM*

MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted July 5, 2022** Honolulu, Hawaii

Before: WARDLAW, NGUYEN, and OWENS, Circuit Judges.

Xiangfu Chen, a native and citizen of China, petitions for review of the

Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) decision to dismiss his appeal of the

Immigration Judge’s (“IJ”) denial of his application for asylum, withholding of

removal, and protection under the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”). “We

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). review factual findings, including adverse credibility determinations, for

substantial evidence,”…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.