United States v. Mack Harris
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJuly 8, 202221-35633California703 words
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS JUL 8 2022
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 21-35633
Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. No. 1:13-cr-00098-SPW-1 v.
MACK EDWARD HARRIS, MEMORANDUM*
Defendant-Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Montana Susan P. Watters, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted July 6, 2022** Portland, Oregon
Before: WATFORD, R. NELSON, and LEE, Circuit Judges.
Mack Edward Harris appeals from the district court’s order dismissing his
motion under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 to vacate, set aside, or correct his sentence. We
affirm.
1. The district court correctly concluded that Harris’s claim under Rehaif v.
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Page 2 of 4
United States, 139 S. Ct. 2191 (2019), was procedurally defaulted and that,…