Sara Sanchez-Resendiz v. Merrick Garland

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJuly 8, 202217-73511California460 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS JUL 8 2022

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

SARA SANCHEZ-RESENDIZ, No. 17-73511

Petitioner, Agency No. A078-048-655

v.

MEMORANDUM*

MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted July 6, 2022** Portland, Oregon

Before: WATFORD, R. NELSON, and LEE, Circuit Judges.

Sara Sanchez-Resendiz petitions for review of an order of the Board of

Immigration Appeals (BIA) denying her motion to reopen or reconsider her

removal proceedings. We have limited jurisdiction to review for legal or

constitutional error, see Bonilla v. Lynch, 840 F.3d 575, 588 (9th Cir. 2016), and

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Page 2 of 3

we deny the petition.

In Sanchez-Resendez v. Lynch, 608 F. App’x 537, 538 (9th Cir. 2015),…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.