Sara Sanchez-Resendiz v. Merrick Garland
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJuly 8, 202217-73511California460 words
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS JUL 8 2022
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
SARA SANCHEZ-RESENDIZ, No. 17-73511
Petitioner, Agency No. A078-048-655
v.
MEMORANDUM*
MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General,
Respondent.
On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals
Submitted July 6, 2022** Portland, Oregon
Before: WATFORD, R. NELSON, and LEE, Circuit Judges.
Sara Sanchez-Resendiz petitions for review of an order of the Board of
Immigration Appeals (BIA) denying her motion to reopen or reconsider her
removal proceedings. We have limited jurisdiction to review for legal or
constitutional error, see Bonilla v. Lynch, 840 F.3d 575, 588 (9th Cir. 2016), and
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Page 2 of 3
we deny the petition.
In Sanchez-Resendez v. Lynch, 608 F. App’x 537, 538 (9th Cir. 2015),…