Rudy Villeda Mejia v. Merrick Garland

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJuly 8, 202217-72341California555 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS JUL 8 2022

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

RUDY ALEXANDER VILLEDA MEJIA, No. 17-72341 AKA Rudy Villeda-Mejia, Agency No. A088-367-378 Petitioner,

v. MEMORANDUM*

MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted July 6, 2022** Seattle, Washington

Before: HAWKINS and BUMATAY, Circuit Judges, and SEEBORG,*** District Judge.

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). *** The Honorable Richard Seeborg, Chief United States District Judge for the Northern District of California, sitting by designation. Petitioner Rudy Alexander Villeda Mejia (“Villeda”) is a native of Honduras

who is subject to a reinstated removal order. He appeals from a decision of the Board

of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”),…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.