Kabir Shamim v. Merrick Garland

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJuly 8, 202217-71181California764 words

Opinion

Opinion

FILED

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

JUL 8 2022

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

KABIR HOSSAIN SHAMIM, No. 17-71181

Petitioner, Agency No. A206-914-116

v.

MEMORANDUM*

MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted June 10, 2022** Portland, Oregon

Before: SCHROEDER and SANCHEZ, Circuit Judges, and ANTOON,*** District Judge.

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). *** The Honorable John Antoon II, United States District Judge for the Middle District of Florida, sitting by designation. Kabir Shamim, a native and citizen of Bangladesh, petitions for review of a

decision by the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) upholding the Immigration

Judge’s (IJ) denial of his application for asylum, withholding of removal, and

protection under the Convention Against Torture…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.