Jose Molina v. Merrick Garland

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJuly 8, 202220-72043California1,091 words

Opinion

Opinion

FILED

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

JUL 8 2022

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

JOSE WILSON MOLINA, No. 20-72043

Petitioner, Agency No. A208-836-784

v.

MEMORANDUM*

MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted June 13, 2022** San Francisco, California

Before: BYBEE, CALLAHAN, and COLLINS, Circuit Judges.

Petitioner Jose Wilson Molina is a citizen of Honduras who entered the

United States around August 2004 without inspection. He seeks relief from denial

of an application for asylum, withholding of removal, and protection under the

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Convention Against Torture (CAT) by an immigration judge (IJ) that was affirmed

by the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA). The agency determined that Molina’s

asylum claim was time…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.