James Wright, Jr. v. E. Hendrichsen

FILED

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

JUL 8 2022

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

JAMES O. WRIGHT, Jr., No. 19-35676

Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 3:17-cv-05961-RBL

v.

MEMORANDUM*

E. M. HENDRICHSEN, #3603; et al.,

Defendants-Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Washington Ronald B. Leighton, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted July 6, 2022**

Before: WALLACE, FERNANDEZ, and SILVERMAN, Circuit Judges.

James Wright appeals from the district court’s summary judgment in favor

of two defendant police officers in his 28 U.S.C. § 1983 civil rights action alleging

malicious prosecution. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). review the summary judgment de novo, Newman v. County of Orange, 457 F.3d

991, 993 (9th Cir. 2006), and affirm.

Summary…