Carlos Rodriguez Juarez v. Merrick Garland

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJuly 8, 202220-73815California916 words

Opinion

Opinion

FILED

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

JUL 8 2022

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

CARLOS EMILIO RODRIGUEZ No. 20-73815

JUAREZ,

Agency No. A209-127-654 Petitioner,

v. MEMORANDUM*

MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted June 14, 2022** San Francisco, California

Before: BYBEE, CALLAHAN, and COLLINS, Circuit Judges.

Carlos Emilio Rodriguez Juarez is a citizen of Honduras who entered the

United States without a valid entry document on August 15, 2016. An immigration

judge (IJ) denied Rodriguez Juarez’s applications for asylum, withholding of

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). removal, and protection under the Convention Against Torture (CAT). The Board

of Immigration Appeals (BIA) affirmed. Petitioner argues for relief on…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.