United States v. Nathan Pablo

15 F.3d 1093 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Nathan PABLO, Defendant-Appellant. No. 93-10346. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Jan. 4, 1994. * Decided Jan. 11, 1994. Before: REINHARDT, O'SCANNLAIN and KLEINFELD, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** OVERVIEW 2 Nathan Pablo appeals from a district court sentence ordering him to pay restitution pursuant to the Victim Witness Protection Act, 18 U.S.C. Sec. 3664 (a). We affirm. DISCUSSION 3 The district court, in sentencing Pablo for kidnapping in violation of 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1201 , ordered Pablo to pay the victim $25.00 per month during his incarceration and supervised release, a combined period of 136 months. Pablo made no objection to this order of restitution at the time it was imposed. Accordingly, we review for plain error. Fed.R.Crim.P. 52(a). 4 The Supreme Court recently circumscribed the bounds of the plain error rule in United States v.…