United States v. Rebecca Ann Loudermilk

Good Law
15 F.3d 1093·1994 WL 20016·1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 6727
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJanuary 26, 199493-30026California443 words

Opinion

Opinion

15 F.3d 1093 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Rebecca Ann LOUDERMILK, Defendant-Appellant. No. 93-30026. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Jan. 7, 1994. * Decided Jan. 26, 1994. 1 Before: POOLE and TROTT, Circuit Judges, and KING, ** District Judge. 2 MEMORANDUM *** 3 Defendant appeals her sentence after her guilty plea conviction for possession of counterfeit obligations in violation of 18 U.S.C. Secs. 472 and 2. She received a prison term of 27 months. In making her sentencing determination under the Sentencing Guidelines, the district judge gave her the benefit of a two-level reduction for acceptance of responsibility. 4 Her only argument on this appeal is that the district judge should have given her the additional third-level reduction authorized by the November 1, 1992, amendments to the Sentencing Guidelines for 5 (1) timely providing complete information to the government…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.