United States v. Vincent Meo

15 F.3d 1093 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Vincent MEO Defendant-Appellant. No. 92-10197. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Nov. 5, 1993. * Decided Jan. 18, 1994. 1 Before: KOZINSKI, O'SCANNLAIN, Circuit Judges, and THOMAS S. ZILLY, District Judge. ** 2 MEMORANDUM *** 3 Vincent Meo timely appealed his conviction and sentence for bankruptcy fraud, and moved for correction of the record on appeal. We deny the motion to correct the record and AFFIRM the district court's conviction and sentence. FACTS 4 In early 1984, appeallant Vincent Meo established All American Recreational Vehicles (AARV), a dealership engaged in renting and selling recreational vehicles and motorhomes (RVs). Mr. Meo served as president of the corporation. Two RV companies, Winnebago and Fleetwood, had financing agreements with Mr. Meo and AARV under which those companies would provide RVs to AARV and would then be…