United States v. Sukit Mongkhonwitayakun, A/K/A Sukij Mongkolwitayakul

15 F.3d 1093 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Sukit MONGKHONWITAYAKUN, a/k/a Sukij Mongkolwitayakul, Defendant-Appellant. No. 92-10686. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted Nov. 1, 1993. Decided Jan. 25, 1994. Before: POOLE, WIGGINS and T.G. NELSON, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM * 2 Sukit Mongkhonwitayakun ("Sukit") appeals his jury conviction for conspiracy to import heroin in violation of 21 U.S.C. Secs. 952 , 960, & 963. Sukit also appeals his sentence under the United States Sentencing Guidelines. We affirm both his conviction and his sentence. DISCUSSION 3 Our review of a supposed withdrawal of a request to admit evidence at trial mixes questions of law and fact related to our jurisdiction which we review de novo. See DeNieva v. Reyes, 966 F.2d 480 , 482 n. 1 (9th Cir.1992); Moss v. Comm'r Internal Revenue, 831 F.2d 833 , 838 n. 9 (9th Cir.1987). 4 The evidentiary issues…