United States v. Laurence H. Meyer

15 F.3d 1093 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Laurence H. MEYER, Defendant-Appellant. No. 93-35057. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Jan. 4, 1994. * Decided Jan. 12, 1994. Before: REINHARDT, O'SCANNLAIN, and KLEINFELD, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Laurence H. Meyer appeals the district court's denial of his 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2255 motion to vacate his conviction and sentence. Meyer contends that he received ineffective assistance of counsel. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Secs. 1291 , 2253. We review de novo, United States v. Angelone, 894 F.2d 1129, 1130 (9th Cir.1990), and we affirm. 3 Meyer was charged in a one-count indictment with possession of 500 or more grams of cocaine with intent to distribute, a violation of 21 U.S.C. Sec. 841 (a)(1). Meyer pleaded guilty and was sentenced to eighty-eight months in prison and an additional four years of supervised release. Meyer…