United States v. Richard Madril

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJuly 11, 202220-10421California2,427 words

Opinion

Opinion

FILED

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

JUL 11 2022

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 20-10421

Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. Nos. 4:18-cr-01309-RM-LAB-2 v. 4:18-cr-01309-RM-LAB

RICHARD A. MADRIL,

MEMORANDUM*

Defendant-Appellant.

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 21-10208

Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. No. 4:18-cr-01309-RM-LAB-2 v.

RICHARD A. MADRIL,

Defendant-Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Arizona Rosemary Márquez, District Judge, Presiding

Argued and Submitted May 10, 2022 Pasadena, California

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. Before: McKEOWN and IKUTA, Circuit Judges, and DANIELS,** District Judge.

Richard Madril appeals his conviction for conspiracy under 18 U.S.C. § 371

following a trial, and the district court’s restitution order. We have jurisdiction

under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.

I

Madril and his wife,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.