Jorge Pineda-Rojas v. Merrick Garland

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJuly 11, 202217-71775California626 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS JUL 11 2022

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

JORGE JAVIER PINEDA-ROJAS, No. 17-71775

Petitioner, Agency No. A200-884-739

v.

MEMORANDUM*

MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted July 7, 2022** Seattle, Washington

Before: CLIFTON and BUMATAY, Circuit Judges, and SEEBORG,*** District Judge.

Jorge Pineda-Rojas petitions for review of a Board of Immigration Appeals

(“BIA”) decision denying his applications for asylum, withholding of removal, and

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). *** The Honorable Richard Seeborg, Chief United States District Judge for the Northern District of California, sitting by designation. relief under the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”). We review denials of…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.