Eberto Bautista v. Rabi Roskamm

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJuly 11, 202221-15476California726 words

Opinion

Opinion

FILED

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

JUL 11 2022

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

EBERTO BAUTISTA, No. 21-15476

Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 3:18-cv-00194-MMD-WGC v.

RABI ROSKAMM; HENRY, Culinary MEMORANDUM* MGR; RENEE BAKER, Warden;

CHARLES DANIELS,

Defendants-Appellees,

and

NEVADA DEPARTMENT OF

CORRECTIONS,

Defendant,

v.

STEVEN BRAUNSTEIN, Proposed Intervenor; STEPHEN CIOLINO, Proposed Intervenor,

Movants.

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Nevada Miranda M. Du, Chief District Judge, Presiding

Submitted July 8, 2022** San Francisco, California

Before: WALLACE, FERNANDEZ, and SILVERMAN, Circuit Judges.

Nevada prisoner Eberto Bautista appeals pro se from the district court’s

summary judgment to the Defendants1 in his action alleging that his First

Amendment, RLUIPA,2 and equal protection rights were infringed by policies and

practices regarding the food served at…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.