Armando Perez v. Cheryl Strange

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJuly 11, 202221-35203California1,006 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS JUL 11 2022

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

ARMANDO PEREZ, No. 21-35203

Petitioner-Appellant, D.C. No. 2:20-cv-01419-RSL

v.

MEMORANDUM

CHERYL STRANGE, Secretary, Washington Department of Corrections,

Respondent-Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Washington Robert S. Lasnik, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted July 7, 2022** Seattle, Washington

Before: CLIFTON and BUMATAY, Circuit Judges, and SEEBORG,*** District Judge.

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). *** The Honorable Richard Seeborg, Chief United States District Judge for the Northern District of California, sitting by designation. Armando Perez petitioned the district court for habeas relief under 28 U.S.C.

§ 2254. A magistrate judge issued a report and recommendation…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.